#Ifart app code android

Apple's terms specifically limit interpreters and emulators - enough to force one Ruby implementation to disable the best parts of the eval function. That kind of openness is often rejected by the Apple App Store because Apple seems to fear the possibility that someone might add or modify the functionality of a program. It's the fastest way to generate a custom app - the only code you need to know is SQL and the UI helps you with that. Another useful app, Remote DB, lets you turn any SQL query into a button that searches the database remotely, then displays the results.

#Ifart app code android

GScript, for instance, is an Android app that lets you write your own shell scripts and fire them off with a tap. While iPhone developers have found that one path to success is playing to our baser instincts (until Apple shuts them down), a number of Android applications are offering practical solutions that unlock the power of a phone that's really a Unix machine you can slip into your pocket. The iPhone app marketplace is dramatically larger and deeper, but there's already a palpable difference in the style. The differences become apparent if you want to do more than make a few phone calls and iFart around. To my unsophisticated eye, the iPhone interfaces still look a bit prettier, but for most basic uses, iPhone and Android are as similar as Ford and Mercury or Coke and Pepsi. Both let you call people and fire up a number of apps by mashing your finger into one of an endless matrix of square icons.

The Android line is now competitive enough that the casual user may look at the two platforms and assume they're twins. The good news is that the platform is not only competitive but is often a better choice than the iPhone for many programmers and the enterprises that employ them. Can Google Android phones compete with the Apple iPhone? A few weeks ago, Google loaned me a Nexus One smartphone for experimentation, and I've spent the time since downloading applications and writing my own code.